The anatomical circumference of a chicken can achieve perfection by being equally tall as it is wide and containing no obtrusive angles. When viewed from any given side, a perfect chicken is one that most resembles a circle.
I may have given you a slightly skewed view on how much humans like the concept of chickens. I would, however, pay you 1,000g per hour to be allowed to carry Peppercorn around and/or play/nap/cuddle.
[Guess who is not remotely sorry.]
Edited (whoop - subject lines are a thing) 2021-06-06 01:20 (UTC)
[Begrudgingly, she'll switch to voice to field this question.]
This chicken has the special property of being adorable and docile. A perfect feathered orb to place upon your lap. The objective being... you just hold her! Have you never held an animal before? It's very relaxing.
Anyway, if all chickens were for food, then we wouldn't have eggs, now would we?
The perfection of the chicken is in the eye of the beholder. One prefers a soft chicken, the other a fluffy one, one is fond of brown feathers, the other white. Another might be hungry and deems a perfect chicken one that is roasted above a fire.
Hypothetical or not, your question is completely illogical.
The question isn't illogical. The subjective perfection of the chicken is *part* of the question, since I never presented a chicken for inspection. *If* a perfect chicken is presented to you, there's nothing logically unsound about asking what monetary worth you place on holding that chicken.
text - un:IZZYGRRRL83
How could a chicken be perfect, it's a chicken.
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text | un: Rocketman
[Guess who is not remotely sorry.]
no subject
And 1,000g per hour isn't a bad rate. I will take your offer into consideration. Would you pay more if I let you feed her?
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: birdofprey (cw: mention of violence towards the chicken)
no subject
I am now going to have a ban list for holding this chicken, and yours is the first name on it. Congratulations~
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text | un: weimou
no subject
Okay, then how much would you pay by the minute for this perfectly delightful chicken?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
voice; un: ensignledo
no subject
This chicken has the special property of being adorable and docile. A perfect feathered orb to place upon your lap. The objective being... you just hold her! Have you never held an animal before? It's very relaxing.
Anyway, if all chickens were for food, then we wouldn't have eggs, now would we?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: coolguykeigo
no subject
I just thought that some people might like to hold a chicken. Do *you* get a chance to hold chickens where you're from?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: 0123
no subject
Especially since I am discovering that there are way too many people here who don't understand the difference between food and a pet.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: seaglass
no subject
Is Rishi more perfect than Peppercorn? I don't know about that.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: boring
Set clear rules of conduct for interacting with the chicken ahead of time.
-Lan Wangji
no subject
I mean, Peppercorn is used to putting up with a lot, but that doesn't mean she *should*.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
text; un: heaven&hell
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
1/2
2/2
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
un: cassius
Hypothetical or not, your question is completely illogical.
no subject
The question isn't illogical. The subjective perfection of the chicken is *part* of the question, since I never presented a chicken for inspection. *If* a perfect chicken is presented to you, there's nothing logically unsound about asking what monetary worth you place on holding that chicken.
(no subject)
(no subject)