Mukuro Ikusaba (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
corpsewarblade) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
avalononline2021-08-27 01:18 pm
corpsewarblade) wrote in avalononline2021-08-27 01:18 pm
Entry tags:
- danganronpa: mukuro ikusaba,
- dc comics: stephanie brown,
- fate/go: izo,
- fate/go: kadoc zemlupus,
- fate/go: oda kipposhi,
- fe3h: byleth eisner,
- fe3h: claude von riegan,
- final fantasy xiv: emet-selch,
- genshin impact: childe,
- gintama: toshirou hijikata,
- hellsing: walter c. dornez,
- little fires everywhere: izzy richardson,
- star wars: mitth'raw'nuruodo,
- suisei no gargantia: ledo,
- the elder scrolls: finn onaru,
- the secret world: lee jongdae
Ninth: A Tactical Decision (Text; anon)
(TW: Murder/Sororicide, Betrayal, DR Spoilers)
[The last few months had given Mukuro a lot to think about- especially with regard to her own death back home. One part still didn't make any sense to her:
What had she done wrong? Why had Junko killed her?
...It was with those thoughts swimming around in her head that she sent another late night message to the network.]
27 AUG XX, 0324
Reviewing the strategy from a recent battle at home. I want to understand the rational for the decisions taken.
A soldier is engaged in a stealth/undercover mission. However, they have made a mistake that risks the operation's success, and have not realised their error.
The mission commander is in a position to eliminate the operative to preserve their mission, without exposing themselves in the process.
Is that course of action reasonable? To put it another way- under what circumstances would you consider sacrificing one of your own men to ensure a mission's success or to prevent it's failure?
Don't feel you have to answer.
🔪
[The last few months had given Mukuro a lot to think about- especially with regard to her own death back home. One part still didn't make any sense to her:
What had she done wrong? Why had Junko killed her?
...It was with those thoughts swimming around in her head that she sent another late night message to the network.]
27 AUG XX, 0324
Reviewing the strategy from a recent battle at home. I want to understand the rational for the decisions taken.
A soldier is engaged in a stealth/undercover mission. However, they have made a mistake that risks the operation's success, and have not realised their error.
The mission commander is in a position to eliminate the operative to preserve their mission, without exposing themselves in the process.
Is that course of action reasonable? To put it another way- under what circumstances would you consider sacrificing one of your own men to ensure a mission's success or to prevent it's failure?
Don't feel you have to answer.
🔪
no subject
no subject
[She stared at those words as she typed them. It wasn't outside the realm of possibility, was it?
...the denial was strong though.]
No.
No it wasn't that we had a plan
it was
Because the Operative did something wrong.
no subject
So what was the plan then? Go over it step by step for me./span>
Text -> Private text
[And...then she'll lock the feed as it came to the plan itself.]
...I was to impersonate my Commander and infiltrate a small group without raising suspicion, whilst she worked behind the scenes. I was. Her alibi, I guess.
Then stage a confrontation where I would be 'captured' and rendezvous with her. Instead she
She killed me.
Private Text (cw: Mentions of betrayal and death by fire)
Long ago there was a war that had been going on for a hundred years between two kingdoms. The war itself was coming near its end with one at a severe disadvantage after losing a major city.
However, they won the war because of a woman named Rosvita. She was chosen by one of the gods to join the battle and led her comrades into a battle that turned the tide and won back the city and ended the war.
However, for her that wasn't the end. Her own king betrayed her, had her captured and handed her over to the enemy for trial. She was sentenced to die by being burnt at the stake. A rather unpleasant way to go from what I hear.
Despite that, her name and feats are celebrated. She's now known as Saint Rosvita and there are many images of her in the city. Even 500 years later we still honor her and celebrate a festival on the anniversary of the end of the war.
[Of course since he's anon he's not going to get into the full measure of the betrayal like what happened to her comrades or the instance where history repeated itself.]
The obvious mistake was that you raised suspicion somehow. Are you skilled at deception and disguise then? It's definitely not an easy thing to effectively be another person. Even more so when it's not an alias and you are pretending to be someone that group knows.
But I can't shake the betrayal potential. Might be my bias because betrayal is so ingrained in the history of my home, but the feeling is still there. It depends on the type of person your commander is, but faking one's death has been used as a means to disappear before. Can't think of a more effective alibi than that.
Either way, you still died on a mission and I doubt it was in vain. Either you protected your commander or you'll motivate that group to avenge your death. You're here and maybe we'll be able to find a way for you to live on in another world if you so desire it.