corpsewarblade: (I'm sorry Junko)
Mukuro Ikusaba ([personal profile] corpsewarblade) wrote in [community profile] avalononline2021-08-27 01:18 pm

Ninth: A Tactical Decision (Text; anon)

(TW: Murder/Sororicide, Betrayal, DR Spoilers)

[The last few months had given Mukuro a lot to think about- especially with regard to her own death back home. One part still didn't make any sense to her:

What had she done wrong? Why had Junko killed her?

...It was with those thoughts swimming around in her head that she sent another late night message to the network.]


27 AUG XX, 0324

Reviewing the strategy from a recent battle at home. I want to understand the rational for the decisions taken.

A soldier is engaged in a stealth/undercover mission. However, they have made a mistake that risks the operation's success, and have not realised their error.

The mission commander is in a position to eliminate the operative to preserve their mission, without exposing themselves in the process.

Is that course of action reasonable? To put it another way- under what circumstances would you consider sacrificing one of your own men to ensure a mission's success or to prevent it's failure?

Don't feel you have to answer.


🔪
angel_of_death: (Stormy with a chance of ice)

[personal profile] angel_of_death 2021-08-29 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)
[He is not dissuaded by her rebuttal. He will not be deterred.]

Were there any among those she commanded as devoted to their task as you? Was there a single one among them who could have served as a better sword or shield?

Name them.

Name one.
angel_of_death: (Idle mocking)

(Private)

[personal profile] angel_of_death 2021-09-02 07:49 am (UTC)(link)
Then she ought to have put the Ultimate Imposter on the task of going undercover, or at least had them train you.

[She obviously didn't do one, and he's got a very strong impression that she didn't do the other, either.]

So, what enemy was so fearsome that they could possibly be worth putting you on the operation instead? And in that situation, why kill you to prevent your cover from being blown instead of letting you fight? Why bother to put a combatant like you on the task if she was only going to kill you if you slipped up on your acting performance?

There's really only one thing I can think of that would make that decision make any sense.
angel_of_death: (Scrutiny)

(Private text)

[personal profile] angel_of_death 2021-09-03 08:36 am (UTC)(link)
[It's here that he switches over to text communication. This is a statement he wants her to be able to read properly. Let her read it over and over again if she must.]

You weren't placed into that situation for your fighting prowess. You weren't put there because you were a skilled spy or imposter. You were put there for the one trait you had that no one even approached touching you on.

Your loyalty. Your unflinching, unquestioning loyalty.

You dying wasn't because of your failure to follow the plan. It was part of the plan to begin with. You simply were not told.
angel_of_death: (Bring forth the light)

[personal profile] angel_of_death 2021-09-16 08:19 am (UTC)(link)
Was there not a way the apparent death of the person you were playing could benefit her?