Mukuro Ikusaba (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
corpsewarblade) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
avalononline2021-08-27 01:18 pm
corpsewarblade) wrote in avalononline2021-08-27 01:18 pm
Entry tags:
- danganronpa: mukuro ikusaba,
- dc comics: stephanie brown,
- fate/go: izo,
- fate/go: kadoc zemlupus,
- fate/go: oda kipposhi,
- fe3h: byleth eisner,
- fe3h: claude von riegan,
- final fantasy xiv: emet-selch,
- genshin impact: childe,
- gintama: toshirou hijikata,
- hellsing: walter c. dornez,
- little fires everywhere: izzy richardson,
- star wars: mitth'raw'nuruodo,
- suisei no gargantia: ledo,
- the elder scrolls: finn onaru,
- the secret world: lee jongdae
Ninth: A Tactical Decision (Text; anon)
(TW: Murder/Sororicide, Betrayal, DR Spoilers)
[The last few months had given Mukuro a lot to think about- especially with regard to her own death back home. One part still didn't make any sense to her:
What had she done wrong? Why had Junko killed her?
...It was with those thoughts swimming around in her head that she sent another late night message to the network.]
27 AUG XX, 0324
Reviewing the strategy from a recent battle at home. I want to understand the rational for the decisions taken.
A soldier is engaged in a stealth/undercover mission. However, they have made a mistake that risks the operation's success, and have not realised their error.
The mission commander is in a position to eliminate the operative to preserve their mission, without exposing themselves in the process.
Is that course of action reasonable? To put it another way- under what circumstances would you consider sacrificing one of your own men to ensure a mission's success or to prevent it's failure?
Don't feel you have to answer.
🔪
[The last few months had given Mukuro a lot to think about- especially with regard to her own death back home. One part still didn't make any sense to her:
What had she done wrong? Why had Junko killed her?
...It was with those thoughts swimming around in her head that she sent another late night message to the network.]
27 AUG XX, 0324
Reviewing the strategy from a recent battle at home. I want to understand the rational for the decisions taken.
A soldier is engaged in a stealth/undercover mission. However, they have made a mistake that risks the operation's success, and have not realised their error.
The mission commander is in a position to eliminate the operative to preserve their mission, without exposing themselves in the process.
Is that course of action reasonable? To put it another way- under what circumstances would you consider sacrificing one of your own men to ensure a mission's success or to prevent it's failure?
Don't feel you have to answer.
🔪
text; un: manslayer
if that wasnt the agreement and someone tries to kill u heh then u better try and survive out of fuckin spite cuz now u gotta score to settle
no subject
Yes, agreed. It was deserved. A number of people here seem to disagree with that logic, though.
A score?
no subject
but yeah a score
if somebody can take a shot at u and u didnt see it coming then theyre winning. if i got life in me at all i couldnt let that shit stand.
no subject
So you'd expect the operative to come back and 'settle the score' with the Commander who tried to kill them.