No, means are important for minimising collateral whilst causing the greatest harm to the enemy in the process.
I...yes. I value efficiency. But most of the work once a conflict has begun is based on muscle memory. There isn't time to consider in the moment. I would place value in the one who can perform most efficiently.
Unless you're talking tactics. Of course that's important.
no subject
I...yes. I value efficiency. But most of the work once a conflict has begun is based on muscle memory. There isn't time to consider in the moment. I would place value in the one who can perform most efficiently.
Unless you're talking tactics. Of course that's important.
...What...are you trying to understand?